Targeted Supports and Interventions

Time to Read: <1 Minute

TEA has proposed new methodology for identifying campuses in need of supports.

Why it Matters: Being identified for supports puts schools on a countdown to takeover if they don't improve.

Details

Under TEA's proposed methodology, to be identified for Targeted Supports & Interventions (TSI), a campus must have a student group that missed Closing the Gaps (Domain 3) targets for three indicators over three years. Campuses identified for Additional Targeted Supports (ATS) are a subset of TSI campuses. In 2022, the years that will count are 2018, 2019 & 2022.

Only certain Closing the Gaps student groups count:

  • Race/Ethnicity (7)
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Current and Monitored EL
  • Current Special Education

The indicators that count are based on Closing the Gaps methodology for campus type and exclude English Language Proficiency. The minimum size requirement is 25.


https://reflectplando.com/news

Popular posts from this blog

Engagement Culture at LAK24

Image
Time to Read and Watch Video: <6 Minutes The Engagement Culture construct will be among those presented at the New Measures and Metrics in Education Workshop  at LAK24 in Kyoto next week. The goal of the session is to "strengthen the development and utilization of measurement tools from the learning analytics community." Why It Matters: Schools need systemwide indicators to guide intervention decisions, specifically focused on alterable variables (Reschly & Christenson, 2012) to systemically grow student engagement (Fredricks, Reschly, & Christenson, 2019). From the Application What is your measure/metric called? Engagement Culture  Tell us a little about your measure/metric. The Engagement Culture construct, though latent, is discerned through a set of key variables. These variables encapsulate systemic indicators of intrinsic motivation, overall satisfaction, minimal dissatisfaction, and minimal coercion; were informed by Herzberg’s (1974, 2011) research; and...
Read more